Honda Tuning Homepage
Google + Facebook Newsletter

10 Worst Hondas Of All Time - Road Rage

Consider these not so much the worst but perhaps the worst of the not-so-great.

Bad cars are inevitable. Bad cars are necessary. If it weren’t for bad cars, then the good ones might not seem so good. Besides, counting down the list of Honda’s all-time best would be entirely too easy, not to mention entirely too labored a list. Consider these not so much the worst but perhaps the worst of the not-so-great. Some were underpowered. Some lacked proper styling. Some were engineering oddities. Either way, behold, the following are what may well be the 10 worst Hondas of all time, in no particular order.

1992 Acura Vigor: In a world of sophisticated VTEC engines—all of which had even numbers of cylinders—the Legend-like Vigor made do with the oddity that was Honda’s only longitudinally mounted five-cylinder powerplant.

1991 Acura NSX Automatic: Drive one and you’ll quickly realize that no amount of suspension finesse or supercar styling will make up for its slop-box full of clutches, gears, valve bodies, and other nonsense.

1990 Prelude Si 4WS: The world never has and never will require four-wheel steering.

1997 Acura CL 2.2: Heavier and slower than the Accord, Acura’s supposedly upper-echelon model was more expensive than its Honda ancestor yet featured dim performance and curious styling. Bits of its front fascia were also the basis of the 1990s California Integra Type R conversion and earns its place on this list if for no other reason than that.

2002 Civic Si: The first Si to not feature its respective era’s flagship four-cylinder Honda engine. It was also the first in 14 years to have its steering cumbrously connected to its struts and featured the lowest amount of shock travel of any Civic to date.

1994 Honda Passport: Designed by Isuzu. Built by Isuzu. Any questions?

1996 Acura SLX: It looked like an Isuzu Trooper…because it was one. At least one major automotive evaluation firm rolled one over during testing.

2005 Honda Accord Hybrid: When compared to non-hybrid Accords, it performed similarly, achieved marginally better fuel consumption, yet weighed and sold for significantly more.

1993 del Sol S: That Honda didn’t equip the roadster-like del Sol in the wake of Miata domination with an RWD configuration can be forgiven. That it offered a version with its least powerful SOHC 1.5L D series cannot.

2011 CR-Z: They claimed it was the spiritual successor to the late, great CRX. At 122hp, it wasn’t.

Enjoyed this Post? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, or use your favorite social media to recommend us to friends and colleagues!

*Please enter your username

*Please enter your password

*Please enter your comments
Comments:
Not Registered?Signup Here
(1024 character limit)
1Funryd
I would like to give my comment on one of the chassis that Aaron posted up: 88-91 Prelude 4WS
This chassis while under supported is one of Honda's greatest achievements, the 4 Wheel steering still amazes anyone today whom have never driven or ridden in it.  
Just the watching the wheels turn surprises unknowing enthusiasts and the fact that after 24 years to my knowledge there has never been a single failure to this system which added to this chassis uniqueness which is all mechanical unlike its young brothers the 92-01 Preludes.  
It beat super cars in its day in the slalom testing which you can google and find out what cars is out handled, and still does today.
I am doing my part to reviving the aftermarket for this chassis, and it is slowly growing, so Aaron buddy don't discount this chassis just yet, there is still much in the works for it.  Sean
Thomcat
I would like to expresses my amazement after reading Aaron Bonk's article "10 Worst Honda's of All Time."  To include an Acura NSX (in any trim level) in this list is indefensible on any level.  I'm not one to whine on some Internet forum about the stupidity of some Honda Tuning associate editor.  What I can and will do, is choose not to continue my eight year subscription to this magazine. And rest assured I will attempt to convince others to follow the same course of action.
gtimportfanatic
oh and in regards to the CRZ, put a bone stock american Honda CRX up against a CRZ and see what you would prefer, again, just stupid opinionated rants that should not be published because for the morons out there that suck up everything they read instead of what is actually true, it confuses them and sends a bad message.
gtimportfanatic
I laugh at some of the crap that was in this post and it seems to me that it must have been a random rage of thoughts while intoxicated. Just about everything on this list is based off sheer opinion and nothing where the public can say "yes, you are right, i agree." In regards to the 7th gen chassis, EP3, EM2, ES1/2, they all share the same Mcpherson suspension setup, in which the tie rods are on the strut assembly, and in case it was never a discussed fact, just like with a lot of other chassis' there are other modifications needed when altering the ride heights of these vehicles. I admit, it is mostly just one thing not embraced by the crowd of owners that causes an opinionated person to be ignorant to what is needed. Oh, and i should mention that the two cars on the cover of this months copy, Both have that same crappy suspension setup too, because just like DC2/DC4/EJ1/EJ6/EH2 etc. the DC5 and EP3 share similar suspension and other things.
Honda Tuning Magazine